Attorneys
Jason Smolen
jdsmolen@smolenplevy.com
Jason D. Smolen is a founding principal of the firm. He is a member of the Bar in Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. He is a graduate of the City College of the City University of New York and the George Mason University School of Law. Mr. Smolen has gained recognition over the past 31 years for his knowledge of complex business transactions, trusts and estates. He incorporates both his business and financial acumen and estate experience to formulate integrated plans for the benefit of his clients. Mr. Smolen has appeared as a guest expert on television programs and has had articles published in various forums.
Mr. Smolen is a court appointed mediator to the United States Bankruptcy Court and has been appointed by the Fairfax County Circuit Court, Virginia to serve as a trustee, conservator, and has also been called upon to serve as a member of an independent litigation committee.
He is a member of the Fairfax Bar Association, having served in various capacities as Chairman of the Membership Committee (1984-1985) and as a member of the Judicial Screening Committee, (1989-1992). He is also a member of the Washington, D.C. Estate Planning Council.
Mr. Smolen presently serves as president of the Bradley Boulevard Citizens Association in Montgomery County, Maryland. His practice areas include general corporate and business law, tax planning, mergers, acquisitions & sales, fiduciary services, succession planning, and trusts and estates.
Attorney Profile
Jason Smolen is thinking about advising his clients to move. Not that he wants them out of the area—far from it. But with the economy uncertain, the deficit burgeoning and new taxes a possibility, financial savings for many could mean a change of address. Unusual? Yes. But it’s the type of innovative thinking that has established Smolen as a recognized leader in business and estate law. “Right now my clients are very concerned about the direction their taxes are going,” explains Smolen, SmolenPlevy’s cofounding principal. “Part of my job is to figure out how to mitigate their exposure to higher taxes and that includes looking in which state they should live.”
As Smolen sees it, there is a lot of fluidity in where people live in the Washington DC metropolitan area. For instance, clients who move out of Maryland could save on two fronts, income tax presently and later, estate taxes for their heirs. “Maryland is extraordinarily expensive,” says Smolen. “There’s a so-called ’millionaires surtax’ on annual income over a million dollars—and higher taxes on any estate valued over a million dollars. My question is, tax-wise, why would you ever want to live in Maryland if you have other choices?”
As to where clients should relocate, Smolen says Virginia offers some savings—both from an income tax and estate tax perspective. The Sunshine State also has its benefits, with no income tax. “I had one client buy a house in Florida, basically for free,” Smolen says. “It was paid for by the money they saved on taxes just by moving out of their original home state—and it wasn’t an inexpensive house.” Smolen doesn’t proffer this advice lightly, realizing the enormity of the recommendation. “I’m not suggesting that money is more important than social, family and community connections,” he says. “But if the clients’ children and other family members are grown or gone, you’d be remiss not to talk about what states are more tax friendly than others.” In some cases, Smolen suggests keeping a house in their current state, but not making it their primary place of residence. This bold thinking reflects Smolen’s creative approach to clients’ concerns. “We leave nothing off the table when we give our clients options,” says Smolen. But as forward thinking as he is, Smolen makes it a point to consider each idea thoroughly. “We’re aggressive thinkers, but conservative implementers,” he says. “Whatever options we come up with, we want to absolutely make sure each will work while best addressing the clients’ concerns.”
Smolen has been gaining recognition for his knowledge of complex business transactions, trusts and estates for more than three decades. In 1977, Smolen teamed with fellow George Mason University School of Law graduate, Alan Plevy, to create SmolenPlevy. Early on, Smolen says, “I did anything and everything,” referring to the breadth of his areas of practice. “It was an incredibly valuable time, because it gave me a wide range of experiences to determine what I enjoyed doing the most, and where I could be most valuable to our clients.” Over time, Smolen concluded that his passion was in helping clients shape business and estate strategies, rather than in the courtroom. His practice areas now include general corporate and business law, tax planning, mergers, acquisitions & sales, fiduciary services, succession planning and trusts & estates. Along with his experience, Smolen feels one his greatest strengths is his ability to listen to clients and learn about their issues. “That’s the only way to come up with well thought out and creative solutions to accomplish their objectives.” Smolen adds the challenge is to match a client’s wants with their legal needs. “We don’t just have square pegs and square holes. It’s mostly a world of gray—not black and white.”
For instance, Smolen recalls the time a client asked for a simple review of a will that had been written elsewhere. Smolen looked over the document and told the client it was exactly everything they had originally asked for, except it would have cost the client millions of dollars in unnecessary taxes. Smolen solved the problem by revising the document and revising their corporate structure. But the scenario is familiar. “Often clients will come in and think they need just this or that,” Smolen says. “But that’s like going to the doctor and demanding a particular medicine. There needs to be analysis of the issues before one can say that a particular remedy is appropriate. It’s important to me to learn the client’s goals, whether it’s for their business or their estate plan—and frequently, suggest and implement something they’re not previously knowledgeable about or considering. More often than not, our conversation reveals there are other issues that need to be resolved.”
Smolen’s expertise has gained him accolades and plenty of media attention. SmartCEO Magazine named him one of its prestigious Legal Elite, cementing his reputation as a “go-to” attorney in the DC area. ABC News has interviewed him about how to avoid inheritance nightmares. USA Today asked Jason about the possible future direction of estate taxes. E!Online got his take on the late Gary Coleman’s estate planning problems. His analysis of the issues surrounding Michael Jackson’s controversial will received television coverage from FOX 5 and WUSA 9, while his comments on the proper approach to firing during the economic downturn were quoted nationwide, including online on Forbes.com and USA Today. George Mason University’s alumni magazine, Mason Spirit, ran a large profile, spotlighting Smolen, his business partner and their firm’s success.
And what is Smolen recommending to his clients right now? “A review of their estate plan,” answers Smolen, “Especially if it’s something you had written 10 years ago. The laws have changed, your life has changed and your plans need to change too.” As Jason Smolen proves that review will be thorough and far-reaching — perhaps even leading to new states. Jason Smolen can be reached at (703)790-1900 or at jdsmolen@smolenplevy.com.
Alan Plevy
abplevy@smolenplevy.com
Alan B. Plevy is a founding principal of the firm. He is a member of the Bar in Virginia and Maryland. Mr. Plevy is a graduate of the University of Miami and the George Mason University School of Law. He is a well reputed and recognized force in the areas of family law and litigation. Mr. Plevy has vast experience in both negotiating and if necessary, litigating all issues requiring resolution in matrimonial actions including property settlement agreements, custody and visitation issues, and support. Mr. Plevy has received the coveted Martindale Hubbell AV Rating and has been recognized in Super Lawyers and the Washingtonian.
Mr. Plevy serves as Neutral Case Evaluator and Conciliator for the Fairfax County Circuit Court, Virginia and as an Equitable Distribution Mediator for the Montgomery County Circuit Court, Maryland. He is a member of the Fairfax Bar Association where he served in various capacities as a member of the Board of Directors (1982-1988), as Chairman of the Personnel Committee (1983-1985), as Vice Chairman (1980-1981) and Chairman (1981-1982) of the Public Relations Committee and as a member of the Judicial Screening Committee (1996-1997). He is also a member of the Montgomery County Bar Association and the Maryland State Bar Association, Inc.
His practice areas include Civil Litigation, Domestic Relations; Child Custody; Adoptions; and all aspects of divorce. Additionally, he has argued a number of cases to the Court of Appeals in Virginia which are regularly cited as landmark precedent.
Attorney Profile
Alan Plevy knows making a difference as a divorce attorney requires more than just understanding family law statutes. “Divorce law is like no other practice,” says Plevy, explaining that it is essential to at least be familiar and preferable to be an expert in other areas of law. “I have to know everything from tax law to real estate, contracts to estate planning. But being a good divorce attorney also means understanding the importance of listening to my clients as well as knowing all the players at the courthouse.”
After more than 30 years as an attorney, Plevy continues to lead the way in divorce law. Praise comes from industry observers and his peers. Washingtonian Magazine named Plevy one of the best divorce attorneys in the DC area. He has received the coveted Martindale Hubbell AV rating since the 1980s and is consistently honored as a SuperLawyer. While those awards are gratifying, Plevy is most honored on the many occasions when his peers, including fellow lawyers and judges, refer clients. “To have a colleague you’ve gone up against or a judge you’ve been in front of recommend you to others, to have them refer to you their friends and family members, that’s quite a compliment.”
Plevy is not afraid to present issues that may be novel and to argue those issues to appellate courts. Of his cases before the Court of Appeals of Virginia, at least two continue to influence family law decisions in the Commonwealth. In one case, Sullivan v. Knick, the issue of relocation by one parent and the minor child from the state necessitated two trials and two appeals, before Plevy’s client was able to relocate with the child to another state, away from the other parent. Courts have been, and are still reluctant, to permit the child to relocate, especially if the child has regular visitation with the other parent. The reason: the relocation will affect the regular contact the child has with the non-moving parent. However the courts are now more open to using Skype, video conferencing, and depending upon the child’s age, emails and texts to help maintain that relationship. Another case, Srinivasan v. Srinivasan, dates back to the 1980s, but is still regularly cited by attorneys and courts. In that case, the Court allowed an educated ex-wife to receive alimony, despite her advanced degree, so she could train and re-enter the job market. It’s made a difference in the lives of many women as they try to rebuild their careers after being stay-at-home mothers.
Plevy has also had to craft new and interesting ways to address the unique legal situations of his clients. For a child support modification case, Plevy’s client was in Kenya, the other parent in Chile, and neither were able to attend the trial in Maryland. The parents testified via telephone from their respective hemispheres; the only people in the Montgomery County courtroom were Plevy, the opposing attorney, the judge and a clerk. Adding to the challenge, the hearing had to be arranged at a time in consideration of the three different time zones, and Plevy had to get a notebook containing all of the documentary evidence to his client before the hearing, so he could follow the procedure and explain the family budget step-by-step. Plevy’s client prevailed.
Plevy has a simple formula for achieving success. “I enjoy going to court and I like to win for the client,” he says. “What a client considers a ‘win’ however varies depending on the situation. Ultimately, the goal is to do what’s best for that client, whether we negotiate a settlement or we have to litigate. And everyone knows if I have to go to court, I am there to do battle and prevail.”
Long before entering the courtroom, Plevy believes that a vital first step is to listen to his clients. “Clients have a lot to say. They are talking about their lives, families and children, so you should listen to them – no one else has as much information about the case,” Plevy explains. “They give you different perspectives and provide insights. If you listen, they explain why there’s a need to fight for a different visitation schedule for this child. Or they know how the family’s budget was handled or mishandled, and why they may require extra spousal support. Or there could be reasons why they should have sole legal custody of a child as opposed to joint custody, beyond simply being the parent who was generally responsible for those decisions during the marriage.”
Plevy started the firm with business partner, Jason Smolen, in 1977. Both had just graduated from the George Mason University School of Law. As a recent profile in the George Mason Spirit magazine pointed out, the two had nothing to lose, except an IBM Selectric II typewriter they bought for $1,000. More than 30 years later, they still have it. Along the way, SmolenPlevy has grown into a respected law firm recognized for its veteran partners and seasoned associates. The firm still makes it a point to give back to the law school. It endows the SmolenPlevy scholarship, which helps defray the cost of a law school education for out-of-state students who attend George Mason University School of Law.
Additionally, Plevy is frequently interviewed as an expert on divorce law by the media. The New York Times recently interviewed Plevy in a story about how the economy is impacting child support. Men’s Health spotlighted him in a piece about social media and its impact on divorce. Plevy was also featured on News Channel 8‘s Let’s Talk Live, a local D.C. news show, discussing how to better deal with custody issues that arise during the holiday season. Sharing his insights further, Plevy has a number of web videos in which he discusses topics such as the rights of grandparents after a divorce and how to deal with financial issues. They can be seen on the firm’s website (smolenplevy.com) under the “In the Media” tab.
Plevy is upfront with clients about what they’re facing – a “roller-coaster” and how to approach it: “some days are bad but others are better.” He also makes it a priority to be straight about what he can accomplish. “A good lawyer doesn’t make promises he can’t keep. Clients need to know they can’t get everything they want, and their attorney should be honest with them about what they can and cannot expect. And I can honestly tell each client that I’ll work as hard as I can for them.”
Alan Plevy can be reached at (703) 790-1900 and at abplevy@smolenplevy.com.
Matthew J. Campione
Matthew John Campione is a principal of the firm. He is a member of the Bar of New York and the District of Columbia and has been admitted to practice before the U.S. Tax Court. He is a graduate of the State University of New York at Buffalo from which he received both his Bachelor and Juris Doctor degrees. Mr. Campione was formerly employed by the Internal Revenue Service, where he developed an expertise in complex tax regulation and enforcement issues as they pertain to individuals and businesses.
Mr. Campione is a member of the District of Columbia Bar, the American Bar Association and the Washington, D.C. Estate Planning Council. His practice areas include Taxation; Estate Planning; and Business Planning. Attorney Profile During his 35 years as a tax attorney, SmolenPlevy’s Matthew Campione estimates that he has saved clients hundreds of millions of dollars. He accomplished this by successfully defending clients in matters arising with the IRS and by identifying lucrative tax-saving measures in business and estate planning. Campione’s encyclopedic knowledge of the complex tax code has earned him a national reputation as the tax attorney with whom industry insiders consult when they need help or a different perspective. “I minimize risks for clients, and find opportunities,” Campione says, explaining his reputation as a problem solver. Campione analyzes each case on its own merits, refusing to rely on what he calls “cookie cutter solutions.” “Sometimes a transaction requires me to go one way, while a similar problem requires a different approach,” he says. “The key is understanding the possibilities and probabilities for success in each transaction.” A prime example is Campione’s rescue of a long-stalled, though very lucrative, business deal. Campione was the second—and ultimately final – opinion sought when an entrepreneur tried to buy a large company. While Campione can only discuss the situation in broad terms, he reveals that at issue was the company’s new corporate structure. Prior advisors had urged the businessman to avoid a potentially lucrative corporate structure because it would invite tax problems. But when the matter landed on Campione’s desk, he saw a better solution. Not only did he find a way to make the previously questionable corporate structure work legally and effectively, he was able to cite the relevant tax code by memory. With the issue of corporate structure resolved, the entrepreneur was able to buy the company and reap the financial benefits of his purchase. In another transaction, a large nationwide company was trying to buy an entity from one of Campione’s clients. But in Campione’s opinion, the purchaser was structuring the deal disadvantageously. Campione’s client urged the opposing CFO to take another look at the transaction because, as he warned, “Matt doesn’t miss these things.” The next day, the purchasing company’s CFO took Campione’s advice and restructured the deal, in a move that helped both the buyer and the seller. It’s these kinds of insights that land Campione on the short list of expert tax attorneys. Campione first gained an insider’s knowledge of tax law by working at the IRS. He spent eight years at the agency’s national headquarters in DC, helping to develop cutting edge tax law. In one letter opinion, he argued that certain prestigious foundations can award cash prizes tax free. Another one of his notable decisions dealt with the issue of royalties earned by criminals who sell their stories, and who should pay the taxes when the money is awarded to the criminals’ victims. Several of Campione’s letter rulings still stand, more than 25 years after he wrote them. Campione both honed his skills at the IRS and broadened his already impressive legal credentials. Campione dove in when the IRS offered classes taught by some of the most esteemed tax law professors in the country. While most agents attended two or three sessions, Campione took 13 different classes. “Probably no law school around provides the kind of information that was available in those classes,” opines Campione. “To me, it was extraordinary.” But it isn’t just Campione’s knowledge of the IRS’ perspective and workings that is important to his clients’ success. It’s also his low-key but informed approach, especially during audits. “I don’t get adversarial,” Campione explained. “Tough cases are winnable, by having the facts, knowledge of the law, being respectful and always being truthful.” In one memorable high-dollar tax case, Campione established a rapport with the opposing IRS representative—a bond that proved beneficial. Over time, the agent listened as Campione argued two key points. The first was that his client shouldn’t be prosecuted; the second was that the agency should waive a hefty penalty that the client had already paid. Campione won on both counts and not only did the threat of prosecution disappear, but the IRS sent his client a $200,000 refund. Along with his work on tax audits, Campione spends much of his professional time on estate and business planning. In those areas, Campione also leads the way. As an example, he cites his longtime use of Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts (GRAT) and Charitable Lead Trusts (CLT). These days, they’re popular techniques for passing assets to the next generation, but he has been employing the measures for nearly a decade. What comes next as businesses struggle with a slumping economy? Campione recommends a two-prong approach when companies seek to work out, or restructure their debt. On one side, there’s the defensive approach which lays out for clients how the tax law treats certain events, such as foreclosure; but Campione also sees opportunity with an offensive approach. In some cases, he’s able to structure deals that can be quite lucrative for entrepreneurs who are willing to be patient as clients work through their financial issues. “I have the knowledge to deal with the defensive issues,” Campione says, “And the tools to, perhaps, find incredible opportunity in what otherwise would be a bad circumstance.” Matt Campione can be reached at (703) 790-1900 and at mjcampione@smolenplevy.com.
Daniel Ruttenberg
dhruttenberg@smolenplevy.com
Daniel H. Ruttenberg is a principal with the firm. He is a member of the Bar in Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia and is licensed as a Certified Public Accountant by the State of Maryland. Mr. Ruttenberg received his Bachelor of Science degree with a double major in Accounting and Finance from the University of Maryland. He earned his Juris Doctor with Honors from George Mason University School of Law and his Master of Laws in Taxation with Distinction from Georgetown University Law Center.
Mr. Ruttenberg is the author of “The Tax Court’s Execution of the Family Entity: The Tax Court’s Application of Internal Revenue Code Section 2036(a) to Family Entities,” North Dakota Law Review Vol. 80:41 (2004).
Additionally, he serves as a Member of the Board of Directors and as Past-President of the Fairfax Bar Association and as a Member of the Board of Directors and Vice President of the charity, Devotion To Children.
His practice areas include tax planning for businesses, general corporate law, estate planning, and estate administration.
Attorney Profile
Daniel Ruttenberg, JD, CPA, LLM – there are as nearly many letters after his name as there are in it. While the list of credentials is impressive, what’s really important to 14-year partner at SmolenPlevy is what he learned achieving them. It’s to approach his clients’ legal needs from multiple angles. “Most people who refer business to me think of me as a high level tax attorney,” explains Ruttenberg, whose practice areas include tax planning for business, general corporate law, estate planning and estate administration. “Taxes often drive the planning I do with clients, but by no means are they the only factor to consider. There’s family and business politics, cash flow needs, risk tolerance, creditor protection issues and incapacity concerns. The list goes on and on. It’s my job to craft solutions based on those many issues.
Ruttenberg’s extensive education and experience give him the background to develop effective and complex multi-pronged approaches to legal issues. He received his Bachelors of Science with a double major in accounting and finance from the University of Maryland. He then earned his Juris Doctor with Honors from George Mason University School of Law and his Master of Laws (LLM) in Taxation with distinction from Georgetown University Law Center. Ruttenberg is especially proud of his license as a Certified Public Accountant, putting him into an elite group of lawyers with CPAs.
While his vast education and experience make him a leader tackling intricate legal issues, Ruttenberg says his priority is to keep matters understandable for clients. For instance, when establishing an estate plan, “Clients can be reluctant to confront their own mortality. Why make it more difficult?” asks Ruttenberg. Instead, he sits down and speaks with them one-on-one, in person. There’s no one-size-fits all questionnaire to fill out, no paralegal to contend with first. In fact, it’s one of his favorite parts of his law practice. “A lot of information comes out during a conversation that would not appear on paper. I end up getting a much better sense of who they are and what is important to them.”
The trust that develops is vital because as Ruttenberg admits, solutions often require him going beyond what the client initially requests. No matter how complex someone’s business or personal situation, or how high their net worth, most people consider their situations to be very simple and believe all they need is a will. “Most people have not even considered issues such as estate tax planning, whether an inheritance should be held in trust for children, whether they will be avoiding probate, or whether someone they trust will be able to access their assets if they become incapacitated.” Many of these issues cannot be actualized through a simple will.
Most decisions, whether they address personal or corporate matters, require a broad review of the repercussions, tax or otherwise, and potentially may require a preemptive remedy to deal with foreseeable complications. Ruttenberg is able to explain these fairly complex concepts in a straightforward manner, leaving his clients confident in their decisions. “I like to guide them to the solution instead of just telling them what they need. I want my clients to understand what I am recommending and why.”
Too often, Ruttenberg has seen what happens when these issues aren’t addressed properly. A perfect example is when a divorced person remarries, but fails to update their will. New clients have come to Ruttenberg seeking help after one of those spouses died, mistakenly leaving their estates to their former husbands or wives. “In some cases I’m able to help,” says Ruttenberg. “But it’s imperative to keep your estate plans current with the changes in your life. I make sure that happens.”
Despite his busy practice, Ruttenberg is actively involved in his community. For the past six years he has served as Vice-President of the charity, Devotion To Children, which provides access to high-quality educational and childcare programs for children from low-income families, aged six and under. Ruttenberg also recently finished seven years of service as a Director of the Fairfax Bar Association (FBA), a group consisting of over 2,000 attorneys. During this period, he was also elected president – the youngest in FBA history. Ruttenberg also served as a member of the Board of Directors for the Fairfax Law Foundation.
Ruttenberg is a member of the Bars in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia.
Dan Ruttenberg can be reached at (703) 790-1900 and dhruttenberg@smolenplevy.com
Kyung (Kathryn) Dickerson
kndickerson@smolenplevy.com
Kyung (Kathryn) Dickerson, is a principal of the firm. She is a member of the Bar in Virginia and the District of Columbia, and is admitted to practice before the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Virginia and the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. She is a graduate of the University of Virginia and George Mason University School of Law, where she served on the Board of Editors for the Journal of International Legal Studies.
Throughout her career, Ms. Dickerson has received numerous awards and was selected as a “Leader in the Law” by Virginia Lawyers Weekly. Ms. Dickerson has been appointed a Conciliator for the 19th Judicial Circuit and is a member of the Fairfax Bar Association, having served in various capacities as President of its Young Lawyers Section (2003-2004) and as Co-Chair of the Revenue Development Committee (2004-2005). Ms. Dickerson has served as President of the Asian Pacific American Bar Association (2003-2007) and on its Board of Directors (2007- present). She has also served on the Board of Directors of the Virginia Women Attorneys Association (2008-2009) and a member of the Board of Directors the (Northern Virginia Chapter (2003-present) and as secretary (2007-2009). Ms. Dickerson is also a member of the Virginia State Bar’s Special Committee on Lawyer Malpractice Insurance and a member of the George Mason University School of Law Alumni Board. Her practice areas include Civil Litigation; Domestic Relations; Child Custody; Adoptions and all aspects of divorce. Attorney Profile Most family law attorneys regard courtroom proceedings as a necessary, but hopefully avoidable, part of their practice. Not SmolenPlevy’s Kyung (Kathryn) Dickerson, who enjoys the challenge of the courtroom. “I love going to court,” Dickerson says. “It’s a constant proving ground. Being in court keeps you sharp and focused and if you enjoy being in the courtroom, then each appearance teaches you how to become a better attorney.” Even though Dickerson often tries to steer clients away from the courtroom and toward less adversarial negotiations, especially when there are children involved, she knows divorce cases frequently end up in front of a judge. When they do, she’s ready. “The evidence is the evidence. The difference for any client is the ability of his or her attorney to persuasively argue that client’s side of the case to the judge.” Even more than a decade of practice at SmolenPlevy, including the last four years as a principal, Dickerson can often be found working at her desk late at night before a hearing. “By the time we go to trial, I will have memorized my client’s life,” she says. “I can tell you where and when the parties married and where and when they separated. I know the names and ages of their children and where they go to school. I have learned everything that can be discovered about the parties’ assets and liabilities.” Dickerson explains that having a firm grasp of the details gives her an advantage in the proceedings. “You cannot know what the judge is going to ask or what a witness will say (even though they’ve been interviewed). By having learned the details of my client’s case, I can focus on addressing the questions asked by the court and dealing with the unexpected. I can spend my energies actively trying the case because I already have at my command that which is in my control.” Dickerson remembers one case in which the husband, trying to avoid having to pay spousal support, submitted income tax returns that he had filed and testified under oath that he only earned approximately $30,000 per year. Under cross-examination, Dickerson used deposit slips to compel him to admit that he had deposited in excess of $25,000 in the approximate three months prior. The court awarded the wife more spousal support than what the husband had claimed he earned the previous year. Dickerson has had a long established interest in the law. She attended University of Virginia as an undergraduate before earning her law degree at George Mason University School of Law. So what is it that attracted her to the law? “We, as a diverse country full of people who practice different religions, come from different cultural backgrounds, and who are spread across the economic spectrum, codify justice. As citizens, we try to codify what we believe to be right and fair,” she explains. “We do the best we can with it, and we agree to live under these laws. I think that’s pretty amazing.” In addition to her passion for law, Dickerson’s broad experience is another advantage for clients. She knows the nuances. As an example, she points to the varying local court procedures. “Fairfax County Circuit Court has motions on Fridays. Almost any matter that can be heard in 30 minutes can be heard on Fridays,” Dickerson explains. “But in Loudon County, you have only 20 minutes to make your case. Those ten minutes make a big difference in how you prepare and present your case.” Dickerson’s family law practice includes divorce, separation, adoption, assisted conception and premarital and post marital agreements. She noted the rising trend of unhappy couples staying together because the recession made funding two separate households too costly. Now that the economy is improving, Dickerson sees these same couples deciding to divorce—but now struggling with a host of new problems, usually financial. Among them, Dickerson says, “Their credit cards and home equity loans are maxed. They’ve tapped into retirement accounts, and have depleted almost every asset that they own. And unfortunately, the other spouse may not have been informed as to what was necessary to keep the household afloat during the past year, so that spouse is now learning about how much debt was incurred by the parties. Now they’re faced with splitting debt instead of dividing up assets.” Dickerson makes it a point to be straight with her clients. “I try to be compassionate but I’m honest and direct.” Dickerson says it’s important that clients have realistic expectations of the outcomes during divorce process and she makes a point of explaining the potential difficulties of achieving certain unrealistic expectations in each client’s case. She can then outline what may happen, as opposed to simply what the client wants to hear. Just as important, Dickerson listens to her clients, and helps guide them through the painful and complicated process. “Divorce is by its nature destructive, but it can be constructive as well,” Dickerson says. “Clients need to understand there’s life after divorce. I help them plan for that. We’ll come up with a plan that looks towards their financial stability, both while they’re taking the first rocky steps after the end of their marriage—and later as they move on to the rest of their lives.” Kyung Kathryn Dickerson can be reached at (703) 790-1900 or at kndickerson@smolenplevy.com
Scott W. Taylor
swtaylor@smolenplevy.com
Scott W. Taylor is a principal with the firm. He is a member of the Virginia State Bar and is admitted to the United States Tax Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Mr. Taylor earned his Juris Doctor Cum Laude from the George Mason University School of Law in 2001 and a Bachelor of Science Degree (Business) from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) in 1992.
Mr. Taylor is a member of the Fairfax Bar Association and served as the Vice-Chair (2006-2007) and Chair (2005-2006) of the Business Law and Corporate Counsel Section. He is also a member of the American Bar Association and is a member of the Arlington Chamber of Commerce. His practice areas include corporate and business law, real estate, and tax-exempt organizations. Attorney Profile For the newest partner at SMOLENPLEVY, when it comes to a company’s legal issues, Scott Taylor is all business. During his nine years with SMOLENPLEVY, Taylor has served as corporate counsel for a notable list of large and small businesses. “Whether they’re a new enterprise looking to create the right business entity or they are an established business in need of new sources of capital, I work to find solutions to meet their immediate needs and long term goals” says Taylor. He starts by taking an overview of the company’s present condition and its concerns. “Then it’s a matter of knowing where the issues usually crop up. Having a breadth of understanding helps me to uncover an equally broad range of potential issues and then figure out how best to address them.” Recently, Taylor has been busy helping clients deal with the challenging economy. Taylor observes that lenders, after an extended period of reluctance, are showing some willingness to work out and restructure troubled loans. In one instance, a client came to Taylor because it was facing bankruptcy as a development project lingered. Taylor was able to work with the lender to purchase the project loan at a substantial discount. Taylor’s efforts not only kept the client from bankruptcy, it kept the project viable. As with many debt restructuring arrangements, there are on-going tax issues and compliance and regulatory issues, for which Taylor collaborates with the other business attorneys at SMOLENPLEVY to find creative and advantageous solutions. Taylor is also known for his work with nonprofit organizations, which have also faced certain challenges during the economic crisis. Further when clients of the firm want to fund nonprofit entities, locally or internationally, or create organizations as part of their estate planning, Taylor ensures that the specific rules and compliance requirements to establish and operate these types of organizations are met. “This is the breadth of knowledge and experience and the collaborative approach that SMOLENPLEVY attorneys are able to provide,” says Taylor. Taylor works with companies of all sizes and at all stages of their business cycle. At an entity’s inception, he advises businesses as to the corporate entity that best serves their needs and provides them with the most tax advantages. During the operation of a business, Taylor counsels on the classification of service providers as employees or independent contractors, negotiates business arrangements such as teaming agreements with subcontractors and leases for office space and when appropriate, advises the creation of sub-entities. During the growth or expansion of a business, Taylor negotiates with investors interested in purchasing a stake in the company and negotiates the acquisition of a competing concern. Taylor has also guided and counseled companies when they decide to close operations or to allow themselves to be purchased by or merged with a larger entity. Taylor knows that owners may not perceive all of their entity’s needs. Some needs are field specific. For example, owners of a new software firm may need to assess their obligations under prior confidentiality and non-competition agreements, as well as develop terms of use language for their website. Taylor finds that owners and entrepreneurs often present him with a list of their needs; however his analysis uncovers more that needs to be accomplished. “My approach is to step back and look at all the elements and dynamics that are contributing to or causing the legal issues. That way I can provide an overall strategic approach, as opposed to strictly looking at what’s on ‘the list’. Many times we find critical issues that aren’t on ‘the list’ but which must be addressed timely for the client to be able to maintain or reach profitability.” In all, Taylor has worked with local, regional, national and the US operations of international companies, many with hundreds of millions of dollars in assets. His list of clients includes consultants, constructions firms, commercial real estate owner/operators, manufacturers, media companies, real estate developers, restaurant owners/franchisees and software development companies. Taylor is an active member of the Arlington Chamber of Commerce and authored “Tax ramifications associated with common commercial mortgage debt restructuring scenarios” which reflects his insights into the complications associated with debt restructuring and was published in the Mid Atlantic Real Estate Journal, Vol. 22, Issue 3. Taylor earned his Bachelor’s degree in Business at Virginia Tech and worked first in publishing sales and then as a bank loan officer before heading to law school at the George Mason University School of Law, from which he graduated Cum Laude. Taylor firmly believes his education and years in the workplace gave him valuable insights into real world business issues. “I can approach them from the business and banking perspective, as well as assessing the legal ramifications,” says Taylor. “I know what the decision makers are looking for, and that makes a valuable difference for my clients.” Scott Taylor can be reached at (703) 790-1900 and at swtaylor@smolenplevy.com
Joshua B. Isaacs
jbisaacs@smolenplevy.com
Joshua B. Isaacs is an associate with the firm. He is a member of the Bar in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Mr. Isaacs earned his law degree from the Georgetown University Law Center where he served as a Senior Staff Member of the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. He is the author of “Ethical Implications of Collaborative Law,” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics Volume 18:3 (2005).
Mr. Isaacs received his Bachelor of Arts degree with a major in Political Science from Washington University in St. Louis. He is a member of the Fairfax Bar Association where he serves as the President–Elect of the Board of Directors of the Young Lawyers Section. His practice areas include General Litigation with an emphasis in Family Law, Divorce, and Custody.
Gretchyn G. Meinken
ggmeinken@smolenplevy.com
Gretchyn G. Meinken is an associate with SmolenPlevy. She is a member of the Virginia and Maryland State Bars. Ms. Meinken received her Juris Doctorate from the George Mason University School of Law where she served on the Journal of Law, Economics & Policy. She graduated cum laude from the University of Alabama receiving her Bachelors of Science degree in Business Administration,
majoring in both International Finance and German.Ms. Meinken currently serves on the Board of Directors and is Treasurer of the Virginia Women Attorneys Association (Northern Virginia Chapter), and is a member of the Fairfax Bar Association. She is also a member of the Junior League of Northern Virginia. Her practice areas include general corporate law and estate administration.
Monica Handa is an associate with SmolenPlevy. She is a member of the Virginia State Bar and is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Ms. Handa earned her Juris Doctor from the University of North Carolina School of Law; prior to obtaining her law degree, she earned a Bachelor of Arts Degree majoring in Political Science and History from Furman University.
Ms. Handa is also a member of the Fairfax Bar Association, the Virginia Women Attorneys Association (Northern Virginia Chapter), and the South Asian Bar Association of the District of Columbia. Her practice areas include family law and litigation.

